Rumsflued
Some facts to mull over:
Roche has worldwide commercial rights to Tamiflu, and Gilead receives payments from Roche for the successful completion of program milestones and royalties on product sales.
"Roche will continue to take action, both on its own and with a significant number of suppliers, to increase production capacity for Tamiflu to meet seasonal and pandemic needs," the company said in a statement.
Rumsfeld's 94-page financial disclosure form shows that his holdings include between $6 million and $30 million in Gilead Sciences, a pharmaceutical company, plus $1 million to $5 million in vested stock options.
By THE NEW YORK TIMES
WASHINGTON, Oct. 27 - Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has recused himself from government decisions concerning medications to prevent or treat avian flu, rather than sell his stock holdings in the company that patented the antiviral agent Tamiflu, according to a Pentagon memorandum issued Thursday.
The memorandum, to Mr. Rumsfeld's staff from the Pentagon general counsel, said the defense secretary would not take part in decisions that may affect his financial interests in Gilead Sciences Inc.
Before becoming defense secretary in January 2001, Mr. Rumsfeld was chairman of Gilead. On each of his annual financial disclosure statements, he has listed continued stock holdings in the company.
Gilead holds the patent on Tamiflu, but contracts for it are signed with an American subsidiary of F. Hoffman-LaRoche Ltd., which holds marketing and manufacturing rights.
Mr. Rumsfeld will remain involved in matters related to the Pentagon response to an outbreak, so long as none affect Gilead.
UPDATE (October 31, 2005):
As commentor Lou Minatti implies, there are some conspiracy theories out there about Rumsfeld and Tamiflu. From Lou's own post on the topic, these theories range from Tamiflu currently being a completely ineffective treatment for flu to the entire avian flu crisis being cooked up by Rumsfeld himself in order to make an extra million (and counting).
I do not believe in such conspiracy theories, though I admit I find it interesting and entertaining that Rumsfeld's association with Gilead and his current role in the government easily lend themselves to such theories.
I responded to Lou in the comments:
Lou,
I'm not sure what conspiracy theory you are talking about. I typically don't
believe in conspiracy theories.If you are interested in my opinion (because I didn't offer one in the post, after all) I do think that Rumsfeld should have strongly considered immediately selling his already profitable stake in Gilead rather than seeking to continue to profit from decisions his peers and friends and bosses and underlings may/will be making from here on out.
Conflict of interest is hardly a conspiracy theory.
2 Comments:
When I first ran across this bizarre conspiracy theory I wasn't sure that people actually believed it. Now I know better.
Lou,
I'm not sure what conspiracy theory you are talking about. I typically don't believe in conspiracy theories.
If you are interested in my opinion (because I didn't offer one in the post, after all) I do think that Rumsfeld should have strongly considered immediately selling his already profitable stake in Gilead rather than seeking to continue to profit from decisions his peers and friends and bosses and underlings may/will be making from here on out.
Conflict of interest is hardly a conspiracy theory.
Post a Comment
<< Home